Collective Benefits of Ending Homelessness

I was heartened to read in two separate accounts of the At Home/Chez Soi project that the Mental Health Commission of Canada is leading (Huffington Post: Ottawa Citizen ).  Both pieces indicated that the project was on target to prove what all affordable housing providers know, it costs society less to keep a person in a home than on the street.

In Ontario the provincial government funds programs through various ministries; the City of Ottawa distributes money from the Federal, Provincial and its own programs.  The seriousness of our homelessness problems are never as visible as they are in the winter when there are double digit temperatures below zero.

The At Home/Chez Soi project has done much to show that when there is a concentrated effort to provide a home there is more needed than just a roof.  Life skills as simple as respecting and getting along with others can be more challenging than finding a place to live.  The solitude of not having others watch and try to control their lives is one aspect of not having a home that appeals to many.  The At Home/Chez Soi Project address these issues with support and follow up with the clients in the program.

While the monetary benefits help everyone and all levels of government, the greatest benefits go those who have the support and new encouragement to live an independent and healthy lifestyle.   Benefits reach into the most important streams of our live from Health care, Emergency Medical services, Policing and our Judicial System.  Savings in these areas can partially fund the continuation and expansion of the program. Though he does not quote any financial numbers, Malcolm Gladwell writes in his piece “Million Dollar Murray” ( ) the impact that the homeless have on many aspects of our society.

It is my hope that well before the At Home/Chez Soi Project ends in 2013 a firm commitment is made at the Federal,  Provincial and Municipal levels of government to continue and expand the program to include cities outside of those currently (Moncton NB, Montreal QC, Toronto ON, Winnipeg MB and Vancouver BC) involved.  It is incumbent on our community leaders to press Government leaders to openly discuss the role each plays in ending homelessness and providing greater assistance to Non-Profit housing organizations to meet their individual mandates for the level of care they provide their residents. The plight of the homelessness is just as important to our society as looking after our elderly and fragile, ensuring a stable Health Care system and good economic government policies.  These are not only individual but collect concerns for a strong Canadian society.

I can be found Twitter @robertdekker and on Facebook at Please follow me and send your thoughts on this and other postings.

5 thoughts on “Collective Benefits of Ending Homelessness

  1. rabbit

    When someone suffers from mental illness or substance abuse (or both), funding and good intentions are the easy part. Keeping them in the home is the trick.

    1. redheartbluesign Post author

      You are so very right. It takes time and patience to work with those recovering from abuse and addiction. The support workers are the heroes of the support industry when they can help someone make the move to independent living and remain there. There is never enough said for the strength the Support workers have to do their job day in and day out.

  2. Durward

    Homelessness is like poverty, you can’t “fix” it, there will always be homeless just as there will always be the poor.
    Programs like these are just BS ideas to create jobs for the “helpers” at taxpayer expense.
    I have no problem helping the mentally ill who are there through no fault of their own, but addiction is self imposed and is not on my list of those to help.
    Of course there would not be the amount of mentally ill on the streets had the Chretien Liberals not closed down many beds in the mental institutions to balance the budget and thrown them to the street.
    I remember when it happened, I also remember giving food and milk to a poor mentally ill woman who was drinking from a puddle in the middle of winter right after the fact, right outside my house.
    Government has a duty to help the mentally ill but no-one has a duty to help those that won’t help themselves.
    Willpower is all it takes to kick a drug habit, oh it might be painful but what gain in life does not come with pain and sacrifice?
    No way in the world would I support this program, especially when governments are enabling addictions through crack pipe giveaways and free heroin.

    1. dannydeh3

      “Mental illness” and “addiction” are in the eye of the beholder. Are mental institutions a federal responsibility? Aren’t governments enabling addictions to gambling and prescription drugs?

  3. AMS

    There are a lot of things that have more value than people think.

    It’s not always possible, to partly agree with other posters, but when a person can be reintegrated into productive society there is a large impact. The costs of crime and health care may be greatly reduced and the fact that there is another member of society helping pay the collective tax burden makes it ever so slightly less of a burden for everyone else.

    Addiction, on the other hand, is a powerful thing. I’m thankful that I wasn’t born into a seriously troubled life or with the genetics for addiction susceptibility.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.