Tag Archives: #cdnpoli

Book Review: Confidential Conservative: Inside the Fabulous Blue Tent by Fred Litwin

CC Fred Litwin

One of my struggles has always been with movements, movements that struggle to catch the attention of the mainstream to be recognized and accepted. I have been proud to say that I have had an open mind to listen to everyone and be able to have an open discussion. Fred Litwin’s new book “Confidential Conservative” challenged my previous thinking; it disturbed me that I still have strong feelings simmering. If Litwin wanted to challenge us in our beliefs, he succeeded with this book.

Litwin’s life journey from being a young Jewish boy in a Montreal protestant school, to socialist college to Bay Street to Ottawa takes him through an emotional roller coaster. He goes through his decisions to come out twice, first as a gay man and a second as a conservative. You would be surprised which was harder on him. There are some points when reading the book where I wanted to jump off – but the ride was going to fast.

Litwin gives a detailed account of how 9/11 was not only a world altering event, but it was a political turning point for him as the left and their defense of actions against the America left him wondering about his political home. After seeing the right and Stephen Harper attacked in book after book this book is a refreshing look at how the left wing activists have a habit of tuning out when a logical answer (from the right) is presented, their unabashed belief that conservatives can do no right, do not bring honesty and reflective thinking to issues is down right scary. I know that the right wing has a faction of people that go deaf to reality but the level of abuse that Litwin faces should make all left wing activists bury their heads in shame.

A lot of ink is spent describing the gay community and its visceral hatred of all things conservative. He is especially hard on the gay press and turning a blind eye to the positive actions that the Harper government had done to improve the lives of gays persecuted internationally. But rather than give an inch of recognition to a conservative government, the Gay media continually mount verbal attacks to strike fear that Harper would turn Canada to a modern version of Salem. This was difficult for me to read as the gay community has been making great strides into the main stream, but the book makes a point that perhaps a portion of the Gay (I think it is a small and extremely vocal part) community wants nothing more than still be considered “bad boys and bad girls’ of society. That would be a shame as those who I know that are gay and are valuable members of the Ottawa community making great contributions suffer because of their actions.

Litwin describes how he started the Free Thinking Film Society began and his ‘adventures’ in bringing films like “Iranium” and “Obsession” to Ottawa. He takes on the CBC and their obsession with left leaning journalism and news telling, Michael Moore and writes with some regret I think of friendships lost due to political beliefs, not his per say, but at the inflexibility of his friends in their beliefs.

The challenging parts of the book for this reader involved two areas. First was “My Dinner with David” where Litwin struggles with Islam vs Islamists. He details how he lost friends over the idea that all those that follow Islam are not responsible for the actions of Islamists. It was very detailed; I needed to read the chapter twice to understand it fully. It was a sad moment for to think that for some friendship can’t survive ideological jousting.

The second was the postscript to the book, if not for the timing of the publishing of the book, it could have included the outcome of the recent federal election. Having spoken to Fred about it when I was last in Ottawa I know it would have been a fabulous addition to the book and turned the postscript in to a full chapter. The postscript shows Fred’s frustration with right wing fanatics and some extreme right wing politicos, much in the same way the left wing forced him out of the Liberal party years earlier. It saddens me that the conservatives could lose someone as intelligent as Fred, someone who can break down an issue and discuss it calmly and reasonably because of far right wing conservatives that can’t understand that a big tent is part of being able to govern. I hope that Fred hangs in there and waits out the Conservative Party leadership contest before making any moves.

To see someone go after the left in the manner Fred did was satisfying to read, I am tired of seeing the right continually attacked as we were in the election because they did not like a leader. I am sure most of the left will dismiss what he says, but it’s an essential read for conservatives, and those Blue Liberals, as a record of how conservatives can have a fabulous blue tent, can achieve good things and not have turned back the calendar 200 years back to the puritan ways.

I invite you to share your ideas by commenting to this post or any post on my blog. You can also email me directly at robdekkeroc@gmail.com.

I can be found Twitter @robertdekker, @rdmediaottawa and on Facebook at http://tiny.cc/n5l97.

Advertisements

Which #elxn is your favourite?

voting

Election 42 is almost in the books, is that a relief or cause for concern? Are you worried that Election 43 will be here sooner than you want? Will 2018 be the year we have three elections in Ontario? Will the winner of Election 42 make it through to Canada’s 150th? I know a few that feel Election 41 was the BEST!

Was this the ‘most important’ election ever for Canada? Should the next election have that moniker? Should we have waited until the next election to use that term? It does it get over used. EVERY election is an important election, is one more important than another? That is almost like asking a parent which one of their children they love the most.

This election has been the ‘hate’ election, and personally that scares the living daylights out of me.

Elections are about hope, the future and yes one form of change (a leader, party or direction). Even though the leaders of ALL parties did not utter the word hate, it was certainly inferred each and every day. The tone of this election changed from the pre-election “whip out their f-18’s” to this elections opening week “stop Harper”, and it almost happened in the blink of an eye.

I am not big on the use of the word hate, I have preached to my two kids, now, young adults, to not use the word – that hate starts wars. If you don’t like someone you dis-like them, not hate.

I wish we could go through an election cycle without anger rearing its ugly head, that we don’t stop someone but we start something and that hope is what we reach for and fear is what we will not raise. The partisan emotion reached new highs, causing friends to declare an election truce and not to talk politics – that’s how divided Canada has become. Strangers were venting with such veracity to supporters of other political parties that it became personal with others we didn’t even know! What kind of craziness is that?

Have we started down a slippery slope that we cannot reverse? Should we be wary of the attitudes that Election 43 will bring out in us? There were a few days where I envied the apathetic voter, they didn’t care and didn’t get caught up in the fervour.

Election 41 was the ‘shock’ election, I’ve call Election 42 the “h@+&” election and I am here and now naming Election 43 the “New Hope” election where ideas are brought forward, debates become discussions and rhetoric disappears.

Are you with me?

I invite you to share your ideas by commenting to this post or any post on my blog. You can also email me directly at robdekkeroc@gmail.com.

I can be found Twitter @robertdekker, @rdmediaottawa and on Facebook at http://tiny.cc/n5l97.